Quantcast

McHenry Times

Friday, March 29, 2024

Woodstock City Council met January 15

Shutterstock 135556811

Woodstock City Council met Jan. 15.

Here is the minutes provided by the council:

A regular meeting of the Woodstock City Council was called to order at 7:00 PM by Mayor Brian Sager on Tuesday, January 15, 2019, in the Council Chambers at Woodstock City Hall. Mayor Sager welcomed those present and explained the consent calendar process and invited public participation. He noted as is the City’s policy, this evening’s meeting is being live- streamed with a recording archived should members of the public wish to view it in the future.

City Clerk Smiley confirmed the agenda before the Council was a true and correct copy of the published agenda.

A roll call was taken.

COUNCIL MEMBERS PRESENT: Dan Hart, Maureen Larson, Jim Prindiville, Mark Saladin, Gordon Tebo, Michael Turner, and Mayor Brian Sager.

COUNCIL MEMBERS ABSENT: none

STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Roscoe Stelford, City Attorney Ruth Schlossberg, Assistant City Manager/Finance Director Paul Christensen, Public Works Director Jeff Van Landuyt, Economic Development Director Garrett Anderson, Building and Zoning Director Joe Napolitano, Chief John Lieb, Library Director Nick Weber, Opera House Managing Director Daniel Campbell, Grant Writer/Communications Manager Terry Willcockson, Librarian Pam Moorhouse, and City Engineer Ryan Livingston.

OTHERS PRESENT: Old Courthouse and Sheriff’s House Advisory Commission Member Wendy Piersall, Transportation Commission Chairman Andrew Celentano and City Clerk Cindy Smiley

III., PROCLAMATION

1. Groundhog Day

Mayor Sager stated it is a tradition in Woodstock to celebrate Groundhog Day, inviting everyone to participate in the celebration. He noted this evening, distinguished guests are present, including Woodstock Willie and members of the Groundhog Days Committee, inviting them forward.

Without objection, the City Council approved and accepted the Proclamation Declaring February 2nd, 2019 Groundhog Day in the City of Woodstock.

Mayor Sager read the Proclamation and presented it to the distinguished guests. On behalf of the Committee, Pam Moorhouse thanked the City Council for its support of the Groundhog Day celebration.

IV. FLOOR DISCUSSION Public Comment

There were no comments forthcoming from the Public.

Council Comment

There were no comments forthcoming from the City Council.

Woodstock City Council 01/15/19

V. PUBLIC HEARINGS

A. Annexation/Rezoning - 1096 Lake Avenue

Councilman M. Saladin recused himself and exited the Council Chambers at 7:09 PM.

Mayor Sager stated this Public Hearing is the legal procedure for the annexation and rezoning of property located at 1096 Lake Avenue. He stated Council will be considering approval of an Ordinance authorizing the execution of an Annexation Agreement for the property at 1096 Lake Avenue, approval of an ordinance annexing the property at 1096 Lake Avenue, and approval of an ordinance approving a Zoning Map Amendment to M1 Light Manufacturing District for 1096 Lake Avenue.

Mayor Sager opened the Public Hearing at 7:10 PM and invited members of the public who wished to address the Council to come forward.

There were no comments forthcoming from the Public.

Motion by M. Turner, second by M. Larson, to close the Public Hearing for the Annexation/Rezoning of 1096 Lake Avenue. Noting there were no objections from the public and without objection from the City Council, Mayor Sager proceeded to Public Hearing #2.

B. Annexation/Rezoning – Vacant Lake Avenue Property

Mayor Sager stated this public hearing is to consider approval of an Ordinance authorizing the execution of an Annexation Agreement for the vacant property located between IL Route 47 and Lake Avenue, approval of an Ordinance annexing the vacant property located between IL Route 47 and Lake Avenue, and an Ordinance approving a Zoning Map Amendment to M1 Light Manufacturing District for the vacant property located between IL Route 47 and Lake Avenue.

Mayor Sager opened the Public Hearing at 7:12 PM and invited members of the public who wished to address the Council to come forward.

In response to a question from Lidija Baltabols, Private Ships, Mr. Napolitano described both properties in question, noting they are both unincorporated islands surrounded by the City of Woodstock that are interested in annexing into the City.

Susan Handelsman talked about the PIN numbers of the properties in the area, opining they are connected to Alliance. She asked which PIN numbers are being considered for annexation and what zoning change is being proposed for them, noting they are now zoned commercial/industrial. Mayor Sager stated they are proposed to be rezoned M1 Light Manufacturing District.

In response to a question from Ms. Handelsman, Mayor Sager stated they are being annexed because the City is always interested in annexing properties that are islands within the City. In response to further questioning, Mayor Sager stated this item will be considered at this time, before discussion and consideration of the TIF.

Ms. Baltabols stated this is a reason to delay consideration of the TIF, opining it was not in compliance with the posting.

Noting this is a discussion and consideration of the annexations, Mayor Sager asked if Ms. Baltalbols’ comments are in objection to the annexations. Ms. Baltalbols stated she is in opposition because she requests a delay for this before the TIF goes through.

In response to a question from Mayor Sager, there was no further public comment.

Motion by M. Larson, second by G. Tebo, to close the Public Hearing.

A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: D. Hart, M. Larson, J. Prindiville, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: M. Saladin. Motion carried. The Public Hearing was closed at 7:21 PM.

Motion by M. Turner, second by M. Larson, to approve Ordinance 19-O-01, identified as Document 1, An Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of an Annexation Agreement for the Property at 1096 Lake Avenue.

In response to a question from Mayor Sager, there was no Council comment forthcoming. In response to a question from Mayor Sager, there was no Public comment forthcoming.

A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: D. Hart, M. Larson, J. Prindiville, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: M. Saladin. Motion carried.

Motion by M. Turner, second by J. Prindiville, to extend the unanimous vote on Document 1, to the following:

Ordinance 19-O-02, identified as Document 2, An Ordinance Annexing the Property at 1096 Lake Avenue;

Ordinance 19-O-03, identified as Document 3, An Ordinance Approving a Zoning Map Amendment to M1 Light Manufacturing District for 1096 Lake Avenue;

Ordinance 19-O-04, identified as Document 4, An Ordinance Authorizing the Execution of an Annexation Agreement for the Vacant Property Located between IL Route 47 and Lake Avenue; Ordinance 19-O-05, identified as Document 5, An Ordinance Annexing the Vacant Property Located Between IL Route 47 and Lake Avenue; and

Ordinance 19-O-06, identified as Document 6, An Ordinance Approving a Zoning Map Amendment to M1 Light Manufacturing District for the Vacant Property Located Between IL Route 47 and Lake Avenue.

In response to a question from the Public concerning water usage, Mr. Napolitano stated there is no development being proposed for this property.

A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: D. Hart, M. Larson, J. Prindiville, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: M. Saladin. Motion carried.

Councilman M. Saladin returned to the Council Chambers and rejoined the proceedings at 7:27 PM.

V. CONSENT AGENDA

Motion by M. Saladin, second by M. Larson, to approve the Consent Agenda.

The following items were removed from the Consent Agenda by a Councilmember or a member of the Public:

Item D-1 – Ordinance – Amendment of Eligible Liquor Licenses Qualifying for Video Gaming Licenses by Councilman D. Hart

Item D-2 – Ordinance – Class IV Liquor License for Holzlager Brewing, 150 S. Eastwood Dr., Unit A by Councilman D. Hart

Item D-3 – Ordinance - Class E-4A Liquor License for Sofie’s Whiskey & Wine, 150 S. Eastwood Dr., Unit C by Councilman D. Hart

Item D-4 – Ordinance – Class BYOB Liquor Permit for EmpowHer Boutique, 129 Van Buren Street by Councilman D. Hart

Item D-5 – Ordinance – Adoption of a Redevelopment Plan and Program, Project Area, and TIF Financing (TIF#2) by Mayor Brian Sager

Item D-14 – Downtown Plan by Mayor Brian Sager

In response to a question from Mayor Sager, the following comments were made, or questions asked by the City Council or the Public concerning items remaining on the Consent Agenda.

Item D-6 – City Boards and Commissions Nominations

Mayor Sager noted his pleasure at forwarding these individuals to the City Council for appointment to the City’s Boards and Commissions and his appreciation for their willingness to serve in this capacity.

Mayor Sager affirmed the Consent Agenda to include the following items:

A. MINUTES:

December 18, 2018 City Council Minutes

B. WARRANTS: #3839 #3840 #3841

C. MINUTES AND REPORTS:

Public Works Department Monthly Report December 2018

Woodstock Police Department Monthly Report November 2018

D. MANAGER’S REPORT NO. 126

6. City Boards and Commissions Nominations - Approval of the following nominees for Boards and Commissions for existing vacant positions:

Cody Sheriff - appointment to the Plan Commission with a term ending in 2020 Marybeth Urbin - appointment to the Library Board of Trustees with a term ending in 2021

Zachary Klehr - appointment to the Zoning Board of Appeals with a term ending in 2024

7. Ordinance – Board of Library Trustees – Monthly Meeting Day Change - Approval of Ordinance 19-O-07, identified as Document 14, An Ordinance Amending Section 2.3.3, Meetings, of Chapter 3, Board of Library Trustees, of Title 2, Boards and Commissions, of the Woodstock City Code changing the meeting day to the second Thursday of each calendar month.

8. Award of Contract – Engineering Agreement for Melody Lane Bridge Replacement – Authorization to Award a contract to Baxter and Woodman Consulting Engineers for the provision of Phase I Design Engineering Services related to the rehabilitation of Melody Lane Bridge at a cost not-to-exceed $131,780.73.

9. Ordinance – Annexation of City Property at 13707 W. Jackson Street – Approval of the following:

a) Ordinance 19-O-08, identified as Document 15, An Ordinance Annexing the Property at 13707 W. Jackson Street; and

b) Ordinance 19-O-09, identified as Document 16, An Ordinance Approving a Zoning Map Amendment to B4 Office District and a Variation for the West Side Yard Setback from 10 Feet to 0 Feet for Property Located at 13707 W. Jackson Street, Woodstock, Illinois

10. Award of Contract – Hydraulic Modeling for Kimball Ave. Storm Sewer –

Authorization to award a contract to Hampton, Lenzini & Renwick Inc. for design engineering services related to the Kimball Avenue/Raintree Park Hydraulic Modeling at a cost not-to-exceed $17,560.

11.Purchase of Sewer Televising Equipment – Approval of the following: a) Purchase of an Envirosight Jetscan unit at a cost of $13,250;

b) Purchase of an Envirosight Quickview at a cost of $16,500; and

c) Award of purchase for both items a) and b) to Envirosight’s authorized Manufacturers’ Representative, Standard Equipment Company, Chicago, Illinois

12. Award of Contract – 2018 Leaf Collection Contract – Authorization to approve an extension of a contract to Dahm Enterprises Inc. for Leaf Disposal Services for calendar years 2018 and 2019 based upon year two and year three prices, as documented in the bid received on February 10, 2017.

13. Purchase of WWTP Grinder – Authorization to purchase a reconditioned grinder from JWC Environmental, Los Angeles, CA for installation at the City’s Southside Wastewater Treatment Plant for an amount not-to-exceed $20,010.59

A roll call vote was taken on items A through C and D-6 through D-13. Ayes: D. Hart, M. Larson, J. Prindiville, M. Saladin, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: none. Motion carried.

Item D-1 – Ordinance – Amendment of Eligible Liquor Licenses Qualifying for Video Gaming Licenses

Councilman D. Hart recused himself and left the Council Chambers at 7:34 PM.

Councilman M. Saladin recused himself and left the Council Chambers at 7:34 PM.

Motion by M. Turner, second by G. Tebo, to approve Ordinance 19-O-10, identified as Document 7, An Ordinance Amending Section 3.3.5, Video Gaming Terminals, of the City of Woodstock.

Councilman Prindiville stated he is opposed to this action because he is not in favor of expanding video gaming into this classification.

Mayor Sager provided a brief explanation of the proposed action and opened the floor to Public Comment. There was none.

A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: M. Larson, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: J. Prindiville. Abstentions: none. Absentees: D. Hart and M. Saladin. Motion carried.

Item D-2 – Ordinance – Class IV Liquor License for Holzlager Brewing, 150 S. Eastwood Dr., Unit A

Motion by M. Turner, second by M. Larson, to approve Ordinance 19-O-11, identified as Document 8, An Ordinance Amending Section 3.3.6, Classification of Licenses; Number and Fees of the Woodstock City Code, which would increase the number of Class IV liquor licenses by one (1) and the number of video gaming license to twenty-two (22) for Holzlager Brewing Company, LLC, 160 S. Eastwood Drive, Unit A, Woodstock, contingent upon fulfillment of all identified requirements.

Councilman Prindiville expressed his appreciation to this business, opining it is a good addition to the city, but stated he is not in favor of this ordinance because it includes video gaming.

Mayor Sager briefly explained the proposed action, providing information on the limitations that have been placed on the number of video gaming licenses allowed in the city. He then opened the floor to Public Comment.

Tom Schultz stated he feels this establishment is too close to a residential area, opining this type of establishment is not needed in the area. Mayor Sager expressed appreciation for Mr. Schultz’s comments noting the property does sit within the appropriate zoning designation.

A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: M. Larson, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: J. Prindiville. Abstentions: none. Absentees: D. Hart and M. Saladin. Motion carried.

Councilman M. Saladin returned to the Council Chambers and rejoined the proceedings at 7:40 PM.

Item D-3 – Ordinance – Class E-4V Liquor License for Sofie’s Whiskey & Wine, 150 S. Eastwood Dr., Unit C

Motion by M. Larson, second by M. Saladin, to approve Ordinance 19-O-12, identified as Document 9, An Ordinance Amending Section 3.3.6, Classification of Licenses; Number and Fees of the Woodstock City Code, which would increase the number of Class E4 liquor licenses by one (1) and the number of video gaming licenses to twenty-three (23) for Sofie’s Whiskey & Wine, 150 S. Eastwood Drive, Unit C, Woodstock, contingent upon fulfillment of all identified requirements.

A brief discussion ensued of the number of units in this building.

Councilman Prindiville expressed his appreciation for this business, opining it is a nice addition to Woodstock. He noted he is again not in favor of this action because of the expansion of video gaming.

Mayor Sager opened the floor to Public Comment.

Tom Schultz objected to this action, opining the establishment is too close to a residential area.

A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: M. Larson, M. Saladin, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: J. Prindiville. Abstentions: none. Absentees: D. Hart. Motion carried.

Item D-4 – Ordinance – Class BYOB Liquor Permit for EmpowHer Boutique, 129 Van Buren Street

Motion by M. Saladin, second by M. Turner, to approve Ordinance 19-O-13, identified as Document 10, An Ordinance Amending Section 3.3.6, Classification of Licenses; Number and Fees of the Woodstock City Code, which would increase the number of Class BYOB liquor permits by one (1) for EmpowHer Boutique, 129 Van Buren Street, Woodstock, contingent upon fulfillment of all identified requirements.

In response to a question from Mayor Sager, there were no comments or questions forthcoming from the City Council or the Public.

A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: M. Larson, J. Prindiville, M. Saladin, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: D. Hart. Motion carried

Item D-5 – Ordinance – Adoption of a Redevelopment Plan and Program, Project Area, and TIF Financing (TIF#2)

Economic Development Director Garrett Anderson gave a brief presentation concerning TIF #2, providing information on some of the potential uses of TIF funds and how TIF #2 will interact with TIF #1. He also discussed some of the potential projects included in TIF #2 and the benefits it would have for the community. Mr. Anderson also reviewed the management and on- going process of TIF #2.

Mr. Anderson stated the TIF revenue is limited to the increase in the assessed value of real property within the TIF District. He provided information on what TIF funds can be used for, noting they cannot be used for new construction.

He then explained the “but for” test which asked “but for” the assistance of the TIF, will private investment be available to develop these areas of the community, which are suffering from some form of blight? He noted many of the properties in the area are those for which development has not occurred for many years, stating the City is using the TIF to try to overcome issues that have kept the properties from being developed.

Mr. Anderson provided information on TIF #1, including some of the projects that have been completed because of it. He described the projects in TIF #1 which have not been completed and which are, therefore, being removed from TIF #1 and placed in TIF #2.

Mr. Anderson then provided information on some of the projects identified for inclusion in TIF #2, including Woodstock Station, the Public Works yard, the former Russell’s Building Supply site, 329 Lake Avenue, and the Pioneer Center site on South Jefferson among others. He noted TIF funds can also be used to assist the properties along Route 47 when the expansion project begins.

Mr. Anderson discussed the development review process, noting it will not change because of the TIF. He stated the Plan Commission, Historic Preservation Commission, and City Council will still be involved in the process as required, noting this will make sure the projects approved will add value to the community. He stated management of the TIF will be by senior City Staff, the Joint Review Board, and through regular required reporting to the State.

Mayor Sager opened the floor to comments and questions from the City Council.

Councilman Tebo opined TIF #1 has helped the Downtown and expressed support that TIF #2 includes Route 47.

In response to Councilman Tebo’s question, Mr. Anderson stated approximately $500,000 in annual property taxes will be disbursed to the various taxing bodies upon expiration of TIF #1. Councilman Tebo noted District 200 will receive 60% of that amount.

In response to a question from Councilman Turner, Mr. Anderson described the process by which a developer could receive TIF funds, including the review process. He stated the project would eventually come before the City Council for approval. Councilman Turner noted this means there is a process where all uses are reviewed by Staff and the Public Body. Mr. Christensen stated during the review process, the City will be looking very strongly at the “but for” test, with Councilman Turner noting this means the “but for” test is on-going not just to determine implementation of the TIF.

In response to a question from Councilman Prindiville concerning a redevelopment agreement with any potential developer, Mr. Anderson described this agreement process noting it dictates the potential reimbursement amount, what is reimbursable, and what the anticipated expenses are. In response to further questioning from Councilman Prindiville, Mr. Anderson confirmed this is a contract which puts in writing the City’s expectations of the developer.

Councilman Saladin stated he looks at this from a policy standpoint, looking at the value and quality of the new improvements and what they will mean to the community vs. a perceived threat to the taxing bodies. He talked about the goals of the City’s various policies and plans, including the Comprehensive Plan, one of which is to encourage economic revitalization and to support economic expansion. He opined the creation of TIF #2 would support these goals, as it is an area that has significant needs regarding abandoned and vacant properties. He stated if the Route 47 improvement project is funded, TIF #2 will be an opportunity for assistance.

Councilman Saladin noted development is occurring throughout the County and opined the City has to take advantage of this economic incentive. He stated there is tremendous competition for development, opining if people think development “just happens,” they are being naïve. He noted seven projects have already come forward, stating they would not have come to Woodstock “but for” the proposed TIF #2. He stated he has to look to what is best for Woodstock, noting some years ago the legislature gave municipalities the opportunity to create TIF districts, which has not changed.

Mayor Sager opened the floor to Public Comment concerning adoption of an ordinance of the City of Woodstock, McHenry County, Illinois, approving Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan & Program TIF #2 – Downtown and Route 47.

Michael Rein, 329 N. Seminary, spoke in favor of tabling this decision. He stated although he appreciates the idea of economic development, he feels this plan will put stress on the taxing bodies because they will have to make up the difference. He opined this will put stress on the taxpayers, hurt renters, and add pressure to the schools.

He stated there has not been a comprehensive plan regarding the TIF and what the city wishes to look like and opined the residents should be able to look at this. He urged that there be a vision. He opined it should be about job growth and business not housing. He also opined it is not the role of government to decide who should and should not get the money.

Mr. Rein noted this is being considered now even through three current Council members are not seeking re-election, meaning there will be three new members. He opined the decision should be deferred until after the election so the citizens can decide.

Mr. Rein opined the Farmers Market hampers business on the Square as it takes up parking. He opined a better place for the Market would be the property across from the Moose.

In response, Mayor Sager stated there is, indeed, a vision, noting the various plans already in existence and the Downtown Plan which is on this evening’s agenda. He talked about the Comprehensive Plan and other plans. He stated economic development includes business, commercial, industrial, and retail. He stated the City knows when trying to bring in business and industry, one of the points that is always raised by potential developers is the number of households within a certain radii they are considering. He noted there must be a balance between residential and business, stating this is also essential in balancing the tax structure and base. He stated this is one of the most critical elements of economic development. Mayor Sager stated one of the best ways the City can begin to manage high property taxes is to have this balance between residential and business.

Mayor Sager talked about the City’s efforts to lower property taxes, including forgoing the PTELL for eight years, which has saved Woodstock’s property owners $9.5 million. He noted the City also reduced the municipal portion of property taxes by 10% in the last fiscal year, stating the City Council has worked to bring property taxes down. He stated other taxing bodies have followed the city’s lead to do this.

Mayor Sager again stated the best way to balance property taxes is through economic development, which will generate additional taxes including property tax, sales tax, and income tax which will reduce reliance on property tax revenue.

Mayor Sager stated the City Council has an obligation and in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan to try to address economic development. He opined this is about investing in the community and noted TIF funds are there to accomplish economic growth.

Noting even though there was an economic decline during the term of TIF #1, it still allowed for some incredible improvements in the community, including those made to clean up the former Die Cast site.

Concerning the process and procedures, Mayor Sager noted this is how the system works, with the City Council charged with that responsibility. He stated Council will not table this item, noting any candidates are invited to make any comments they wish.

Councilman Saladin stated when elected four years ago he earned the right to vote on issues that come before him and will protect that right until he is no longer seated.

Sue Handelsman spoke in opposition to the proposed action. She took issue with many of the comments made by Mr. Anderson, opining they are factually inaccurate. She opined TIF #2 will take too much property off the tax rolls. She provided information which she has taken from various sources.

Ms. Handelsman opined this will not revitalize Woodstock, opining other parts of the country have come out of the recession because they have tightened their belts. She opined many TIFs are not successful.

Ms. Handelsman then talked about the Lakewood TIF including the agreement between Lakewood and District 200 to reimburse the District for students. She opined this is evidence of the deleterious effect this would have had on District 200. She further opined blight is from the tax rate and because spending has not been cut.

Lidija Baltabols, Private Ships, spoke in opposition to the action, opining this is “corporate mumbo jumbo.” She read from the state statutes concerning issuance of bonds.

In response to Ms. Baltabols question concerning the corporate authority for the City of Woodstock, Mayor Sager stated the City Council is elected to be the Corporate Authority for the City of Woodstock and has bonding authority as determined by the State of Illinois.

Ms. Baltabols then took issue with the TIF process, reading from the state statute. She especially took issue with the notice for Public Hearing.

Mayor Sager stated the section of the state statute from which Ms. Baltabols read is not the applicable statute, but is the statute concerning a Business District, not a TIF District. He noted the City engaged a TIF attorney to make sure all state statutes and requirements have been followed. Stating she has no idea of the process involved, Ms. Baltabols opined the item should be tabled as in her opinion the City has not complied.

In response to Ms. Baltabols’ statements, Mayor Sager stated the City has complied and, further, that it is the responsibility of the City Council to move forward with action in accordance with the Public Hearing and established processes, and so the item will not be tabled.

Ms. Baltabols then turned her comments to audits, asking if the state has a right to audit the money indicated with PTELL. In response to further questioning from Ms. Baltabols, Mayor Sager stated the City is audited each year, but there is no specific requirement for PTELL auditing.

Ms. Baltabols opined this issue has been misrepresented and is “sneaky” and stated her belief that bonds are a corporate evil that is dooming government. She stated she does not understand bonds. Mayor Sager explained the purpose of bonds, noting any governmental entity does not have sufficient funds for large improvements, so has the authority to issue bonds, which is essentially a loan. In response to Ms. Baltabols’ questions, discussion followed of the City’s bonding attorneys.

Tom Lafontaine, Sandpiper Lane, spoke in favor of the establishment of TIF #2, and asked about the zoning of the properties within the proposed TIF, commercial vs. residential projects.

Councilman Tebo noted of the total 526 acres, 10% is zoned for residential. Mr. Lafontaine noted this means the City is trying to develop 90% of the area for jobs and improvements to the tax base. He opined this is an appropriate land use within the TIF.

Richard Ahrens, 1632 Wheeler, spoke in favor of the establishment of TIF #2, stating he is excited about TIF #2. He stated the effect of TIF #1 was limited by what happened economically across the country. He opined the process is sound.

Mr. Ahrens stated he sees new business and manufacturing growth in other communities surrounding Woodstock, as well as new retail. He stated this is what is needed in Woodstock.

Mr. Ahrens stated the commercial and industrial growth encouraged under the TIF process will benefit the community and add dollars to the school district without adding students to the schools. Mr. Ahrens noted the schools have a lot of capacity and are not overcrowded, opining the costs for any students will be offset by commercial and industrial growth. He further opined there must be a balance to protect the tax base.

Mr. Ahrens stated in looking at the area for the proposed TIF #2, he sees blighted property for which this is an opportunity to change and improve. He opined this also would be an opportunity to bring additional jobs to Woodstock. He stated he hears many comments wishing the City had more business opportunities, noting this is the proper mechanism to encourage those opportunities.

Mr. Ahrens stated he is excited about TIF #2, opining it is a well-thought out project. He commended the City Council for the project.

Ms. Handelsman opined there will be no tax base from the TIF, only an increase to the taxpayers’ burden.

Councilman Turner stated if there is residential development, he would like to see much of it for empty nesters, which will encourage more shops and restaurants, then development along Route 47. He opined manufacturing and the associated jobs will follow. He stated it is possible more people will want to move here, creating a bump in the value of everyone’s homes. He opined vitalization will occur, and the home values and tax base will go up. He opined the proposed action will offer opportunity.

Mr. Stelford stated under state statute if the City enters into a development agreement that generates students, the City is responsible for reimbursing the school district for those students, up to 25% of the new incremental property taxes.

Ms. Handelsman opined the proposed action will negatively impact the schools and will have no benefit for the Downtown or the property owners. She stated it will not benefit those businesses not located within the TIF.

Councilman Saladin opined Ms. Handelsman has presented some factual inaccuracies, providing information with which she took issue.

Ms. Baltabols again questioned the TIF process. She opined the money for the TIF should be put into roads. She opined it will hurt the City’s water supply. She opined the TIF language exists on another planet and likened it to kudzu.

Dean Lovewell, 324 Dean Street, spoke in favor of the establishment of TIF #2. He stated he could have chosen to live anywhere in the northwest suburbs, but decided on Woodstock because of the community and some of the property that he doesn’t think would be what it is today without TIF #1. He stated he is enthusiastic about what TIF #2 can mean to the community. He stated he thinks the City Council has been transparent, opining there has been abundant information placed on line. He expressed his appreciation for being allowed to voice his support.

There being no further Public Comment, Mayor Sager asked for additional Council comments.

Councilwoman Larson noted the creation of a new TIF District has been discussed for a long time. She stated Council members are residents and taxpayers too. She stated she has no financial interested in any property located within the proposed TIF and is trying to make the best decision for the community.

Councilwoman Larson stated the TIF is a financial tool provided to the City to give economic opportunity. She noted it is difficult to operate in the state of Illinois because surrounding states are pulling residents and businesses away. She opined more will get done better and at a higher quality with the TIF District, and further opined it can offer amenities to the residents which will lead to a desirable place to live and work, not just for 23 years, but for the next 100 years. Councilwoman Larson stated it is important that the Council be stewards of the community and develop things that will be here 150 to 200 years from now. She stated the TIF is one of the tools to make sure this happens.

Councilwoman Larson stated there is a cost to what doesn’t get done, and a cost to being a community that doesn’t move forward. She opined it is not a fair comparison to compare a situation with a TIF to no TIF, as if nothing gets done it will have an impact. She stated her belief that the TIF is necessary to lift up these 500 acres that otherwise will sit stagnant with buildings that are deteriorating. She stated the TIF will make it possible to do high-quality improvements that will benefit the entire community. She stated she will vote on this and is excited about what it can mean.

Councilman Tebo noted he has been in education all his life, stating he worked with the group to add the new school buildings and the high school addition. Stating everyone is acutely aware of the funding difficulties, he stated he has studied the math and does not believe the schools will be hurt by TIF #2. He stated during all the years TIF #1 has been in place, he has not heard once that the schools would have more money if it wasn’t for the TIF. He stated Woodstock has outstanding schools, which can continue. He noted he has never seen a good school system that does not have a good city base. Councilman Tebo stated if people want to move to Woodstock it will help everyone. He stated he has talked to many people and believes overall people support the TIF. Councilman Tebo expressed his support of the creation of TIF #2.

Councilman Prindiville expressed his agreement with all the positive comments and stated his intent to vote in favor of the creation of TIF #2. Stating he would like to address the comments of those troubled by it, he stated in terms of obligations and bonds, the City is doing nothing more than entering into a program set up by the State of Illinois to give municipalities tools to further economic opportunity. He stated if people are concerned about how things are carried out, they should look to the City Council and get involved in the process.

Addressing the concerns of some that the private sector developers who do not need the money will take advantage of the funds, Councilman Prindiville opined there are things that will alleviate this. He urged the Council to enter into development agreements that have maximum transparency.

Addressing the concern expressed with dissatisfaction of TIF #1, Councilman Prindiville opined this comes from the lack of the City’s ability to complete the Woodstock Station development. Noting when that project failed, the bank who took possession sat on it, he suggested the City build safeguards into an agreement with a developer under TIF #2 to ensure the project can go on to completion.

Councilman Prindiville opined this program is in the best interest of the City. He stated he is supportive of the creation of TIF #2 and expressed his thanks to City Staff for bringing it forward to this point.

Councilman Turner stated the TIF is an issue that generates intensity and is one of the more difficult things to understand as there are many complexities to it. He noted this creates uncertainties. He stated after studying the issue and where he believes the city can go, he believes this is worth considering.

Councilman Turner noted the City Council has been good stewards of the peoples’ money, citing the evidence including that for seven years the City Council has foregone the PTELL property tax increase, making it the first taxing body to do this. He noted the City has 12% fewer employees on staff than it did seven years ago, through attrition, not layoff. He reviewed the reductions in the City’s total operating budget over the years. Councilman Turner then discussed the reductions to the City’s property tax levy. He opined if the other government entities in McHenry County would follow suit, everyone would be in a lot better shape. Councilman Turner stated these efforts have, in large part, been due to the leadership of Mayor Sager and the City’s great Staff. He stated his belief that the entire Council takes a serious, business-oriented approach to looking at what it considers. He stated he is pro-growth and pro-economic development. Councilman Turner stated the past years have seen debilitating property tax, opining the state plays a role in this.

Councilman Turner stated he shares the excitement expressed by some tonight and believes this action will spur economic development. He stated he knows there are a lot of “what ifs” but opined if the City does nothing the City will lose the opportunity to elevate the community economically, which he believes would be a mistake.

Councilman Turner stated it is important to understand that but for TIF #1, the former Die Cast site would require cleanup. He also stated but for the current TIF there would not be the enhancements added to the Square, including no movie theater expansion, which is a huge positive. Councilman Turner stated but for TIF #1, the Courthouse would either have had a massive bill, asking what would have been cut and how much would property taxes have to be increased to cover these costs, or the building would have collapsed. He stated the City would not have saved the Old Courthouse without TIF #1.

Councilman Turner spoke of the competition for economic development from other communities and states, noting developers are looking for places to build. He stated if Woodstock can offer them an opportunity, he believes this is worth doing. He stated he believes this is the right course for the City and is excited.

The Mayor again opened the floor to Public Comment.

Lidija Baltabols asked about the timeline, whether there is a grace period after the vote, and whether there is a time span that must be considered before any obligations are made. She opined this is being rushed.

Mayor Sager responded stating if the item is approved this evening, there is a publishing requirement and notification to the County must be made before it goes into effect. He stated there is no grace period. Concerning the issuance of bonds, City Manager Stelford stated the City Council cannot automatically issue bonds without further action. He stated the action tonight simply creates the structure, but the consideration for issuance of bonds would have to come before the City Council again for consideration at a meeting that would be subject to the Open Meetings Act. He stressed that this evening’s action just sets forth the TIF mechanism. Mayor Sager stated any proposed project in the TIF District would also have to go through the normal development process as described earlier.

Stating TIF is not anywhere on earth, Ms. Baltabols stated she is very much opposed to this action. She stated she can understand the rewards of TIF #1 such as the work on the Old Courthouse and the EPA factor, but stated she does not have any trust in this TIF. She opined that tangible things being supported by the taxpayers are at risk and opined the Conservation District should have money. She again expressed her concerns with bonds and the system. She asked for a “playbook” for TIF #2 with information people can look at and review and understand, opining Woodstock is at risk.

Greg Amato, 250 Red Wing, stated he has reviewed the information provided on the City’s website and talked with Garrett Anderson, discussing the item at length. He stated after studying this information and talking with Mr. Anderson, he believes creation of TIF #2 is a good idea. He stated he does not feel it will affect his taxes, noting there is no bond issue involved in the issue before the Council this evening. Mr. Amato noted tax increment financing is not a new concept. He stated he looked up the state regulations concerning TIF, opining there are a lot of regulations and it is not unregulated. He stated he feels the City Council has shown they are fiscally responsible. Opining the city can’t stay where it is, he stated this action is moving the city ahead.

Mr. Amato stated the City has shown fiscal responsibility in taking this action and expressed his support of the creation of TIF #2.

Motion by M. Turner, second by M. Larson, to approve the following:

a) Ordinance 19-O-14, identified as Document 11, An Ordinance Approving Tax Increment Financing Redevelopment Plan & Program TIF#2 – Downtown and Route 47;

b) Ordinance 19-O-15, identified as Document 12, An Ordinance Designating the Proposed Downtown & Route 47 Redevelopment Project Area Pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act; and

c) Ordinance 19-O-16, identified as Document 13, An Ordinance Adopting Tax Increment Allocation Financing for the Downtown and Route 47 Redevelopment Project Area.

In response to a question from Mayor Sager, there was no Public comment.

A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: M. Larson, J. Prindiville, M. Saladin, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: D. Hart. Motion carried.

Mayor Sager thanked the Public for their input. He commended City Staff for their efforts on this matter, noting they have done so with a high degree of professionalism.

Councilman D. Hart returned to the Council Chambers and rejoined the proceedings at 9:44 PM.

14. Downtown Plan

Councilman Prindiville expressed his thanks to City Staff for their efforts on this Plan and to the members of the community who provided input. He stated he likes the emphasis on job creation in the Downtown. He stated he would like Council to consider, in the Public Facilities and Open Space section, the addition of the Old Courthouse and Sheriff’s House. He stated one of the reasons he does not support this Plan is because he thinks it is important to include these buildings as public facilities. He stated in the section on historic landmarks, he would like Council to consider these local historic properties.

Concerning the reference study by the Art Institute of Chicago, Councilman Prindiville noted this was done by a student and stated he would like this individual credited if the study is to be included.

Councilman Prindiville stated he has three concerns with the Plan, so he will not be able to support it.

He stated the goal up until now has been to privatize the Old Courthouse and Sheriff’s House, which he does not support. He stated he feels these should remain public buildings because of their importance to the area. He stated he would like this to give the public an opportunity to understand what civic engagement means and how civics have played a role in the development of society. Councilman Prindiville stated he would like the City to carry this goal through on any use, especially with the taxpayers’ dollars, which have been invested in these buildings.

Councilman Prindiville expressed his opposition to the goal stated in the Plan to continue the Benton Street Boardwalk. He opined this is not good urban planning because the Boardwalk is in the public right-of-way, noting this access and parking should be maximized and maintained. He stated the Boardwalk project limits the opportunity for other businesses to consider North Benton Street because of the lack of parking. He stated he does not agree with the Boardwalk and would like to see the City work to find a better solution to bettering this area.

Councilman Prindiville summarized that his three concerns are: 1) Public facility status for the Old Courthouse; 2) Public facility status for the Sheriff’s House; 3) the Benton Street Boardwalk.

Councilman Turner stated he thinks the presentation of the Plan is outstanding, opining the evolution of the document has been outstanding. He noted this is a collaborative effort of many people, which is why he is in agreement with the Plan.

Councilman Turner noted this Plan is not a specific Development Plan but is a guidepost for developers. He stated it will be distributed to developers to give them a sense of what the City wants to be. He stated the Downtown Plan will be incredibly useful given the interest that has been shown in the City over the last six months and the interest that will be shown in the future. He stated he does not want to delay acceptance of this Plan.

Councilman Turner expressed his respect for Councilman Prindiville’s views. He stated he is willing to see what uses come forward for the Old Courthouse and Sheriff’s House. He stated he concurs they should continue to be held by the City, but is open to a long-term lease if something great should come along. He stated he believes they should continue to stay in public ownership for control.

Concerning the Benton Street Boardwalk, Councilman Turner opined this is not an overwhelming issue. He stated he has received many overwhelmingly positive comments concerning the Boardwalk and thinks it is good to examine the idea of doing something similar elsewhere.

Councilwoman Larson stated the outcome of all the work is a beautiful document, which is going to be a landmark document for the community. In response to a question from Councilwoman Larson concerning distribution, Mr. Anderson stated it will be available on the City’s website. He noted some may be printed, and talked further about how it will be distributed.

Councilman Tebo applauded the efforts to those involved in the creation of the Downtown Plan.

In response to the comments of the other Council members, Councilman Prindiville stated his concerns are based on his understanding of economic development and what is in the best interest of the community. He stated he does not support the Plan because the Council just approved TIF #2 so there are public funds that could potentially carry out what is in this document. He stated it will be used as a budget tool, expressing his concern about how funds may potentially be spent as this document is going to be one from which the budget is created.

Councilman Saladin expressed support of the Plan, noting it gives certain parameters, but does not box the property owner in.

Mayor Sager stated he is pleased with the effort put into the Plan, stating it is an exceptional product and a good visionary document. He noted there will be many other plans which come forward to promote specific sites with greater detail.

Mayor Sager noted his agreement with some of the comments made by Councilman Prindiville. He stated he likes the Benton Street Boardwalk and thinks it needs to be reviewed. He noted the Downtown Plan is a planning document, stating there are a lot of planning documents within the City. Mayor Sager stated he does not see Councilman Prindiville’s concerns as being absolute. He stated he doesn’t see this Downtown Plan as an absolute, definitive, directional document, but rather one that gives flexibility.

Motion by M. Saladin, second by M. Turner, to adopt the City of Woodstock’s Downtown Plan with the following amendments: 1) To include the Old Courthouse and the Sheriff’s House in the Public Facilities section; and 2) To include the name of the student who completed the study cited in the Plan.

In response to a question from Mayor Sager, there was no Public comment.

A roll call vote was taken. Ayes: D. Hart, M. Larson, M. Saladin, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: J. Prindiville. Abstentions: none. Absentees: none. Motion carried.

VII. DISCUSSION

1. Transmittal of FY19/20 – FY28/29 Capital Improvement Program

Mayor Sager noted this item is for transmittal only of the Capital Improvement Program. He stated this is a 10-year plan.

Mayor Sager stated the approach to the Capital Improvement Program now is that items identified for any fiscal year are expected to be completed during that fiscal year. He stated the City is looking to appropriate funds for those items.

City Manager Stelford stated this is the transmittal of the draft plan so Council and the Public can review it. He noted Council will deliberate the CIP as part of the annual budget process. Mr. Stelford stated the Plan will be available on the City’s website.

Councilman Prindiville asked about the process for placing crosswalks on Rt. 47, including what would happen if the City wishes to install crosswalks and then Rt. 47 is widened.

Mr. Stelford stated if the City wishes to move forward with crosswalks, it may do so at 100% of the cost. He noted the challenge is that the City is putting significant effort into the Rt. 47 improvements and would be investing funds in crosswalks that will ultimately be done by the state at their cost, so Staff is reluctant to recommend moving forward with these improvements.

In response to a question from Councilman Prindiville, Mayor Sager stated if the City did the crosswalks and then the State widens Rt. 47, the State will completely fund redoing them, but not at the same location. Councilman Prindiville stated then the justification for not proceeding is to wait until it is not at the City’s cost. Mr. Stelford stated another consideration is the mid-block crosswalks. Mayor Sager stated he agrees the crosswalks are needed on Rt. 47, but opined the timing is inappropriate because they are very costly improvements to spend funds on and have the improvements removed.

In response to a question from Mayor Sager, there was no Public comment.

2. Cherry Tree Inn B&B – Events Review

Mayor Sager stated this item is an events review for the Cherry Tree Inn Bed and Breakfast. He stated when Council originally approved this item, it committed to a review at this time.

Mr. Stelford gave a summary report of the events held at the B&B stating to date no events have been held that would trigger the Special Use. He stated the owners are aware that if that time should come, they must meet with City Staff. He stated the City has had very limited complaints with the events that have been held. Mr. Stelford stated there have been eight police contacts with three of those initiated by the owners. He noted most were parking complaints with one complaint that the Visitor’s and Convention Bureau parked a bus in front for a group they had brought to Woodstock.

Mr. Stelford stated Staff is recommending that Council defer review and if there are any issues Staff will notify Council that a review is needed.

Owners George and Lori Miarecki thanked the Council for considering this action and also thanked the people who have supported them. Mayor Sager thanked them for their investment in the community and for their willingness to work through some of the concerns.

In response to a question from Mayor Sager, there was no Public comment.

In response to a question from Mayor Sager, it was the unanimous consensus of the City Council to concur with Staff’s recommendation.

V. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS

There were no changes, additions, or deletions to the tentative future agendas.

ADJOURN

Motion by M. Larson, second by M. Saladin, to adjourn this regular meeting of the Woodstock City Council to the next regular meeting on Tuesday, February 5, 2019, at 7:00 PM in the Council Chambers. Ayes: D. Hart, M. Larson, J. Prindiville, M. Saladin, G. Tebo, M. Turner, and Mayor Sager. Nays: none. Abstentions: none. Absentees: none. Motion carried.

Meeting adjourned at 10:32 PM.

https://www.woodstockil.gov/sites/default/files/fileattachments/city_council/meeting/25931/f_-_1-15-19_city_council_meeting_-_part_1_of_1_-_minutes.pdf

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

!RECEIVE ALERTS

The next time we write about any of these orgs, we’ll email you a link to the story. You may edit your settings or unsubscribe at any time.
Sign-up

DONATE

Help support the Metric Media Foundation's mission to restore community based news.
Donate